Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Should i trade ryan grant, willis mcgahee, and steve smith for marion barber and wes welker?

Barber is a fantasy stud this year, but he's still got that hurt midsection. He's sucking it up and playing with pain though, and mowing all over defenses. Welker doesn't amount to much without Brady (most other qb's don't throw all that much to the slot receiver). That's a lot to give up for a hurt Barber though. Try to get Barber for McGahee (he's going to be splitting carries anyway) and Smith (Delhomme flops later every year, so his numbers are inconsistant). Grant has been hurt, but he'll emerge later in the year as teams start to try to shut down Green Bay's pass attack. He's fantasy playoff gold!Should i trade ryan grant, willis mcgahee, and steve smith for marion barber and wes welker?
Ryan Grant at best is a decent back up this year. Willis McGahee will be good towards the ';latter'; end of the season. Steve Smith hasn't done anything yet so far... no one knows what will come out of him.





This is the deal, basically your trading 2 below average fantasy football backs (not by skill wise but by fantasy points this year) and a WR that has not put up any kind of decent numbers...but just came back.





In return your getting a proven fantasy point superstar... and a decent wide receiver.





Overall I would take this deal, Ryan Grant will get you nothing in the season, Willis McGahee can't stay healthy. Its pretty much Steve Smith for Marion Barber.. I definitley would do it.





Take Barber, and Welker and go win some games!!





Best of luck





~ Coach Canales ~Should i trade ryan grant, willis mcgahee, and steve smith for marion barber and wes welker?
No dude. Smith and willis are going to be studs and grant is really good. Welker isn't worth squat without Brady. Too much to give up just for Barber
No. That's too much to give up for Barber. And Welker's good, but Cassel isn't effective.
You shouldn't have to give up that much. but definitely try and get Barber.
  • help blackheads
  • No comments:

    Post a Comment